白花泡桐二倍体及四倍体响应盐胁迫的蛋白质组变化的研究Study on tetraploid Paulownia fortunei and its diploid in response to salt stress
曹亚兵,赵振利,翟晓巧,赵婉,邓敏捷,董焱鹏,范国强
摘要(Abstract):
为阐明泡桐多倍体响应盐胁迫的分子机制,本试验以白花泡桐为材料,采用同位素相对标记与绝对定量技术(isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation,iTRAQ)结合液相色谱与串联质谱(liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,LC-MS/MS)定量蛋白质组技术,研究盐处理前后白花泡桐四倍体和对应二倍体的蛋白质表达变化。同时,选择6个差异表达蛋白质进行实时荧光定量PCR(qRT-PCR)验证。通过比对分析,共鉴定到2 851个蛋白质,有32个是倍性相关的盐应答差异蛋白质。KEGG pathway分析发现,这些差异蛋白质主要参与光合作用,信号转导,植物病原相互作用及淀粉和糖代谢等。其中,2-酮戊二酸脱氢酶E1、过氧化物酶和氢离子转运ATP合酶表达差异显著,表明这些蛋白质可能是潜在的盐应答蛋白质。QRT-PCR验证结果表明,mRNA与蛋白质表达水平不一致。
关键词(KeyWords): 白花泡桐;多倍体;盐胁迫;蛋白质组;iTRAQ
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(30571496);; 河南省科技厅科研单位基本业务费(2015JB01003)
作者(Author): 曹亚兵,赵振利,翟晓巧,赵婉,邓敏捷,董焱鹏,范国强
DOI: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2016.05.006
参考文献(References):
- [1]NEMOTO Y,SASAKUMA T.Differential stress responses of early salt-stress responding genes in common wheat[J].Phytochemistry,2002,61(2):129-133.
- [2]LOCY R,CHANGE C,NIELSEN B.Photosynthesis in salt-adapted heterotrophic tobacco cells and regenerated plants[J].Plant Physiology,1996,110(1):321-328.
- [3]孙文喜,孙文鑫,周大旺,等.植物抗盐性生理生化研究进展及提高植物抗盐性对策[J].农业科技通讯,2013(6):174-178.
- [4]SCHROEDER J,DELHAIZE E,FROMMER W,et al.Using membrane transporters to improve crops for sustainable food production[J].Nature,2013,497:60-66.
- [5]曹喜兵,赵改丽,范国强.泡桐MSAP体系建立及引物筛选[J].河南农业大学学报,2012,46(5):535-541.
- [6]邓敏捷,张晓申,范国强,等.四倍体南方泡桐和四倍体白花泡桐对盐胁迫的生理响应研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2013,47(6):702-709.
- [7]王园龙,曹林,邓敏捷,等.利用高通量测序分析白花泡桐盐胁迫相关microRNAs[J].河南农业大学学报,2015,49(4):461-467.
- [8]FAN G Q,WANG L,DENG M,Changes in transcript related to osmosis and intracellular ion homeostasis in paulownia tomentosa under salt stress[J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2016,7:384-391.
- [9]JAILLON O,AURY J M,NOEL B,et al.The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla[J].Nature,2007,449:463-467.
- [10]LEE S,LEE E J,YANG E J,et al.Identification of annexins,calcium-dependent membrane binding proteins that mediate osmotic stress and abscisic acid signal transduction in A rabidopsis[J].Plant Cell,2004,16(6):1378-1391.
- [11]NDIMBA B K,CHIVASA S,SIMON W J,et al.Identification of Arabidopsis salt and osmotic stress responsive proteins using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry[J].Proteomics,2005,5(16):4185-4196.
- [12]MAJOUL T,CHAHED K,ZAMITI E,et al.Analysis by two-dimensional electrophoresis of the effect of salt stress on the polypeptide patterns in roots of a salt-toler-ant and a salt-sensitive cultivar of wheat[J].Electrophoresis,2000,21(12):2562-2565.
- [13]杨春雪,罗秋香,卓丽环,等.Na HCO3胁迫下星星草根特异表达蛋白初步鉴定[J].分子植物育种,2008,6(4):669-674.
- [14]KONG-NGERN K,DADUANG S,WONGKHAM C,et al.Protein profiles in response to salt stress in leaf sheaths of rice seedlings[J].Science Asia,2005,31:403-408.
- [15]邓敏捷,张晓申,范国强,等.四倍体泡桐对盐胁迫生理响应的差异[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(11):42-46.
- [16]WIESE S,REIDEGELD K A,MEYER H E,et al.Protein labeling by i TRAQ:a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research[J].Proteomics,2007,7(3):340-350.
- [17]苏亚春.甘蔗应答黑穗病菌侵染的转录组与蛋白组研究及抗性相关基因挖掘[D].福州:福建农林大学,2014.
- [18]张露婷,吴江,梅丽,等.喜树种源耐盐能力评价及耐盐指标筛选[J].林业科学,2011,47(11):66-72.
- [19]廖岩,陈桂珠.三种红树植物对盐胁迫的生理适应[J].生态学报,2007,27(6):2208-2214.
- [20]赵可夫.植物对盐渍逆境的适应[J].生物学通报,2002,37(6):7-10.
- [21]张丽,张华新.植物耐盐机理的研究进展[J].西南林学院学报,2010,30(3):82-86.
- [22]王臣,虞木奎,王宗星,等.9个楸树无性系对盐胁迫的差异响应[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(2):20-24.
- [23]黄鹏.盐分胁迫对香椿幼苗生长的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2006,41(4):60-63.
- [24]SREENIVASULU N,GRIMM B,WOBUS U,et al.Diferential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt-tolerant and salt sensitive seedlings of foxtail millet(Setaria italica)[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2000,109(4):435-442.
- [25]汤章城.逆境条件下植物游离脯氨酸的累积及其可能的意义[J].植物生理学通讯,1984,4(1):27-32.
- [26]GREENWAY H,MUNNE R.Mechanisms of salt tolerance in non-halophytes[J].Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1980,31:149-190.
- [27]WANG L,ZHAO C,WANG Y,et al.Overexpression of chloroplast-localized small molecular heat-shock protein enhances chilling tolerance in tomato plant[J].Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology,2005,31(2):167-174.